Peer Review Process
Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to the peer reviewer and will go to the next selection by Blind Preview Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a month for a maximum time. In the each manuscript, Peer reviewer will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects. Peer reviewer that collaboration with
Global Communico: Jurnal Mahasiswa Komunikasi dan Dakwah is the experts in the discourse of 1) The Qur'an and New Media Issues 2) The Qur'an and Media Technology 3) Islamic communication studies 4) Da'wah Science Studies 5) Da'wah and Communication Psychology 6) General Communication Science Studies 7) Political Communication 8) Public Relations (PR) 9) Media, culture, and Islam studies 10) Islamic Journalism 11) Marketing Communication, area and issues around it. They were experienced in the prestigious journal management and publication that was spread around the national and abroad. All submitted manuscripts are read by editorial staff. Those Manuscript evaluated by editors to be inappropiate to journal criteria are rejected promptly without external review. Manuscript evaluated to be of potential interest to our readership are sent to blind reviewer. The editors then make a decision based on the reviewer's recommendation from among several possibilities: rejected, revision required, or accepted. The editor has the right to decide which manuscripts submitted to the journal should be published. Review Process:
- Author submit the manuscript
- Editor Evaluation (some manuscript are rejected or returned before the review process)
- Double Bind peer review process
- Editor Decision
- Confirmation to the author
